John R Hunter

Measuring Emissions

Making supply chain carbon visible - and opening a new market

Role
Design Lead
Team
~30 designers, PMs, and engineers across 3 teams
Timeline
12 weeks · Q3 2023
Indigo Footprinting product UI - a US map with crop sourcing regions selected and an emissions summary panel showing production, emissions, and practice data

TL;DR

Led 0→1 discovery that became Indigo's primary strategic bet for 2023–2024.

Self-started: defined scope, recruited team, drove research and design end-to-end.

Built the business case for 3.6× ARR growth (seven → eight figures)

Shipped MVP that landed six-figure revenue in the first three months

The problem

Indigo Ag was a late-stage climate tech company helping large food companies decarbonize supply chains. The open question wasn't only product-it was market: is there a new addressable tier below enterprise, and what would it take to reach them?

Most people think carbon means energy: fuels, efficiency. For food companies, ingredients-not factories or trucks-are roughly 70% of total emissions. Nestlé's public footprint breaks it down: Scope 3 ingredient sourcing is 71.4% of the whole. You can't plan reductions without a baseline. The industry had accountability without visibility.

“Working on how to get our grocery products to net zero carbon by 2040 - and right now we don't even have a baseline.”

- Sustainability Lead, Amazon Fresh

Discovery

I self-started the effort: defined scope, made the case to the VP of Product, recruited a UX researcher and PM, then ran discovery as player-coach-scripting, facilitating, synthesizing-while keeping stakeholders aligned.

Generative research (moderated interviews with supply chain actors and internal SMEs) mixed with sacrificial concept testing: rough sketches meant to be thrown away. That gave people something concrete to react to, cut weeks off learning, and surfaced wrong assumptions before engineering spent a dollar.

The pivot

The leading concept was map-based. Emissions tie to geography; buyers close to the farm got it immediately.

With enterprise food contacts, pushback was immediate. Those buyers don't think in regions-they think in supplier lists. They source finished ingredients (corn meal, vegetable oil) from vendors, not from places on a map. The map was the wrong mental model.

We shipped two modes instead of forcing one: a geospatial map for grain buyers and exploration, and a table for enterprises managing large supplier lists. That wasn't scope creep-it was research doing its job. Catching the mismatch at sketch fidelity let the team reprioritize without a rewrite.

Lo-fi sketch of map-based supply chain concept - before pivot
Early map-first concept (sacrificial)
Indigo Footprinting product UI: US map with sourcing regions and View Table control
Shipped map mode - table mode accessed from here

The bigger idea

The product wasn't only measurement-it connected both sides of a market that couldn't transact before. A grain aggregator can see that their corn carries a lower emissions footprint than a competitor's; that signal reaches CPG brands actively sourcing lower-carbon ingredients. Legible data is what opened the tier below classic enterprise deals.

FarmerGrows crop
Grain aggregatorCollects & trades
CPG brandSources ingredients
Emissions data flows upSourcing decisions flow down

What we built

  • A way to define and model a supply chain
  • Emissions data aligned with industry expectations for formal crediting
  • In-product education on the science so people trust and act on the numbers
Indigo Footprinting and Market+ UI: map draw areas alongside list and insights summary
Map exploration and tabular workflows in the same product story

Impact

  • Built the business case for 3.6× ARR growth (seven → eight figures)
  • Six-figure MVP revenue in the first three months
  • Became Indigo's primary strategic bet for 2023–2024
  • Mapping component work here accelerated later geospatial products

Reflection

This was as much market-making as product design. The hardest part wasn't the UI-it was holding a clear strategic frame while scope and stakeholders grew across three teams. The layoff cut the story short; the early traction was real.